A Governor’s departure from a convention has set off unsavory events

A Governor’s departure from a convention has set off unsavory events

• Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi walks out of Assembly after a tussle with CM Stalin over a speech row.

Creating tension

• Expectations of unsavory events tend to fulfill themselves. The address of Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi to the Legislative Assembly to open the new year’s first session yielded the sort of drama that many foresaw. 
• Mr Ravi has been voicing controversial political views for quite some time. His indiscreet remarks in recent days to the effect that the State should not call itself ‘Tamil Nadu’ and that its politics were “regressive” portended tension when he came to address the House. 
• What was unfortunate about Mr. Ravi’s approach was that this baiting of the DMK regime was carried into the legislature, of which he is an integral part. 
• Against this backdrop, Mr. Ravi chose to skip portions of the prepared text, including a reference to the “Dravidian model of governance” and words commending the law­and­order situation in the State.

Backlash between cm & governor

• There have been instances of Governors deviating from the prepared texts, but unlike in other States, this evoked an immediate backlash from Chief Minister M.K. Stalin. 
• The constitutional convention is that the President or the Governor should not depart from the text, as it is nothing but a statement of policy of the elected government. 
• Most Chief Ministers have in the past avoided confrontation despite the occasional departure from the convention. 
• Mr. Stalin, however, chose to hand out an immediate riposte in the very presence of the Governor through a resolution that said the House record would reflect only the prepared text and not the one with impromptu additions or deletions made during delivery by the Governor.

Consequences of confrontationist attitude

• As soon as he realised the import of Mr Stalin’s speech in Tamil, Mr Ravi walked out, apparently treating the move to adopt the resolution as an affront. 
• The Governor need not have reacted in such a manner, as there is no reason why a deviation from the convention on the Governor’s part should not be met with an immediate response that was also a deviation from the convention.
• The events highlight the consequences of a confrontationist attitude on the part of constitutional functionaries. 
• Future confrontations can be avoided if the Governor gives up his penchant for making politically loaded remarks and is heedful of the State’s political sensibilities. 
• In the longer term, the role of the Governor in the country’s constitutional scheme needs a thorough overhaul, so that incumbents in Raj Bhavan give up their sense of overlordship and focus on their core constitutional functions such as granting assent to Bills.